Poverty

All posts tagged Poverty

“10: In our information, publicity and advertising activities, we shall recognise disaster victims as dignified humans, not hopeless objects.

Respect for the disaster victim as an equal partner in action should never be lost. In our public information we shall portray an objective image of the disaster situation where the capacities and aspirations of disaster victims are highlighted, and not just their vulnerabilities and fears. While we will cooperate with the media in order to enhance public response, we will not allow external or internal demands for publicity to take precedence over the principle of maximising overall relief assistance. We will avoid competing with other disaster response agencies for media coverage in situations where such coverage may be to the detriment of the service provided to the beneficiaries or to the security of our staff or the beneficiaries.”

-The Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Disaster Relief (taken from the Sphere Handbook, 2011 Edition, p.370; Emphasis mine)

It takes a lot to floor me. I’ve seen a lot of dumb stuff in the humanitarian industry. I’m moderately immune to dumbassery these days, and tend to keep my righteous indignation in pretty good check too.

However, a document came to me via a colleague in a partner NGO recently. Said colleague works in a specific emergency context involving refugees and refugee camps, and a fundraising office of said NGO had approached them with a request to bring in a TV crew and do some filming of the refugees and their crisis situation.

Not an unusual request, and under the circumstances of trying to raise both awareness and funds, generally a good idea.

As long as your fundraising office has at least half a clue about international standards of humanitarian fundraising guidelines, as outlined in the Red Cross Code of Conduct excerpt quoted above.

I won’t say much more. Instead, I’m going to lift excerpts directly from the media brief that the fundraising office provided, which instructed the country program exactly what stories they wanted to source for the commercial TV crew they were going to send.

Call me mean-spirited, but I have left the grammatical errors in the original request in place, because I think it adds to the flavour.

Detailed Story Request:

Children under 12 are suggested for the story case main character. If the child is too old, we lose the effectiveness.

Case Examples:

1. Disease/Injury

- AIDS infected, parasite, virus infection and so on. Because of these infections, the child is severely suffering. Please look for disease case that can be seen visually [in the original document, this word is in bold and in red text- MA] such as Elephantiasis, sand flea, one’s arm or leg amputated to protect from further virus infection, severe skin disease and so on. Disease that is so heart-breaking just by looking. Diarrhea and fever are dangerous for children under five but in filming, it is difficult to catch the seriousness of the symptoms because we cannot see from outside. [in the original, underlined and also in red- MA]

With me so far? They talk a little more about emergency medical cases and ‘serious injuries or burns’, and then:

2. Early Marriage

- Because of early marriage… she is not at school getting education but in household to live as young wife.

- She is originally from very poor family and that is why she has to accept early marriage. However she is suffering from disease and her babies are malnutrition and have other diseases.

Are you sure that you want to bother sending a TV crew all the way over here, or shall we just send you some shots of a sad looking kid and you can put your own voice-over onto it, because it seems like you already have the story figured out…

Onwards, and under the section on “Child Headed Family”

- A very young child who is in an age to receive full love and care from parents, but unfortunately the child has no parents (or parents who are very sick) and has to live as the head of the family…

- This child really wants to go to school as her friends in the village but could not go even near to the school. She really desire to get education and better life for the future.

- The child is very young but very loving and attractive child.

Obviously poor kids need to be visually appealing. Cuz, fundraising.

The list goes on. Then towards the end, the fundraising office explains that they want to ensure that “our potential donors can feel the same pain and sadness as if they witness the situation.”

I can think of some ways that could be arranged.

However, to avoid any potential misunderstanding (because it may not have been clear in the run-up), they conclude with a summary of exactly what they’re looking for:

-Children or households in serious poverty

-Children and family suffered by disease, water contamination, inflammation, aids, malaria, malnutrition, etc.

- Situation which was born by extreme poverty

- Sad, abysmal, inhumane scenes and stories that happened by local issues such as conflict, disaster, early marriage, etc.

Final emphasis mine.

So that you don’t damage anything, I am told that the TV crew visit did not go ahead. And I sincerely hope that somebody’s head of fundraising got a firm shoeing.

As the language in the brief suggests, there is a cultural element in play here. Different nations and cultures do have different expectations and standards around what is and is not acceptable in the public domain. Anybody who’s seen an Al Jazeera (Arabic) news report following an Israeli incursion into the West Bank knows that the Middle East has different thresholds for violence on the evening news than you’d expect to find on the BBC.

None the less, the issue of human dignity should be a universal one. The Red Cross Code of Conduct- and other guidelines more specific to humanitarian media and fundraising- are signed by international organizations- I stress that word international- recognizing that we are a global community, and it is simply not appropriate to exploit human suffering simply because our cultural norms say it is okay to do so. Not if we want to remain a part of that same international community, and be treated with any respect whatsoever.

I really wish this was an April Fools Day post. Unfortunately, this level of ignorance still thrives, even within the international aid community.

Burning

So, apparently the world’s ending today. Maybe it’ll all end up looking like this? On the upside, it’ll make things a lot simpler for landscape photographers, because you won’t end up with people barging into your frame, or unwanted vehicles, or anthropometric clutter, or people telling you to stop standing in their field.

Also, the skiing will be killer without all those lift-lines. Especially for those of us smart enough to preposition ourselves with seal-skins and randonée bindings.

Okay, so maybe it isn’t. NASA‘s certainly pretty adamant that it will be a very ordinary Winter Solstice for most of us. In fact, Dr Karl Kruszelnicki presents my personal favourite quote on the whole conversation about theories the world will end today:

On the 21st of December, inconveniently only two shopping days before Christmas the Mayan calendar will click over. But to say the world will end is like saying today’s date is the 29th and therefore your cut lunch will turn into a shoe. That’s how rational and logical it is.

However, for some of us, it will be the end of the world. In a very personal sense, for some of us, our world will end: We will die today. In fact, around 70 million people die each year, which means 190-odd thousand people are going to die today. It is a part of the world we live in. Most of these deaths are natural, just a part of growing older and moving on. For friends and family members, this is often a time of grief, although can also be a time of celebration for a life well lived, under gracious circumstances.

For many people, though, their world will end too quickly. Far sooner than it ought. Their deaths are preventable, in as far as contemporary science and medicine are concerned, but due to a range of injustices- many of them economic, some of them social, others political- they will not have access to the services and technology that might have saved their lives. For example, today:

Roughly 13,000 of us around the world will die because we don’t have access to clean drinking water or sanitation facilities. We will get diseases, most involving diarrhoea and vomiting, dehydrate and die.

Around 1,800 of us will die of malaria, just a small portion of those who will die from a long list of preventable diseases. Around 3,800 children under five will die from vaccine-preventable diseases alone today, and 4,900 people will die of AIDS.

As many as 98,000 people in the world today- as much as half the daily total- will die from causes related to hunger and malnutrition- including that deadly interplay of malnutrition, unclean water and disease.

You get the picture. And that’s just today. Tomorrow, the same thing will happen, the same number, roughly, will die. And the day after that. And the day after that, too.

We have the resources to stop these deaths. And we’re doing it. In terms of disease control especially. With the right regime of drugs, nutrition support and care, HIV/AIDS is no longer the death sentence it used to be. Child mortality in Africa has recently been noted to have fallen significantly, as this widely-acknowledged piece in the Economist from May this year points out:

16 of the 20 African countries which have had detailed surveys of living conditions since 2005 reported falls in their child-mortality rates (this rate is the number of deaths of children under five per 1,000 live births). Twelve had falls of over 4.4% a year, which is the rate of decline that is needed to meet the millennium development goal (MDG) of cutting by two-thirds the child-mortality rate between 1990 and 2015 (see chart). Three countries—Senegal, Rwanda and Kenya—have seen falls of more than 8% a year, almost twice the MDG rate and enough to halve child mortality in about a decade.

Access to clean water is improving in many parts of the world (though in other parts of the world it is falling as water sources become increasingly polluted or used for agricultural production), and emergency interventions by the World Food Program, NGOs and Governments keep millions of people alive each year. We know that world has enough food resources to feed everybody- in fact, we’re producing 17% more food per person today than we were 30 years ago, and that’s despite a 70% population increase (or a good hefty 3 billion-or-so people)- a total of over 2,700 kcal per person per day, enough to sustain the world at the recommended level for adult males in the USA (2,700 kcal, versus females at 2,200 kcal), and well above the recognized average minimum requirement of 1,800 kcal.

We have the resources. The problem is distribution. Which in turn is an issue, as Amartya Sen, the Nobel-prize winning economist pointed out long ago now, of entitlements. In short, power, and will.

There have been many victories in the journey towards solving some of these problems. We still have a long way to go. The situation remains unacceptable. And we’re facing an uphill struggle in many areas. The increasing extremes and erratic nature of global climate patterns are having a direct and tangible impact on marginal communities around the world, and will exacerbate both hunger and water issues, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and large swathes of Asia. As industrialization and technology become increasingly available in poorer, populous parts of the world, demand for unsustainable lifestyles is increasing, resulting in dissatisfaction and the risk of extremism and violence. Industrialization and the intensification of agriculture is reducing the supply of clean water available to maintain healthy people even as water facilities are rolled out to higher and higher portions of the world’s population.

In short, this isn’t a problem with a fixed horizon. This is a constantly moving equation, one that requires continual recalibration.

We won’t fix it today. We won’t fix it tomorrow. But we need to try.

As you head into the Christmas period, I don’t expect us to save the world. But I do ask that we consider the question of what we can contribute to make the planet immediately around us a little better. Is what we’re purchasing really necessary? Has it come from a place of injustice, like the technology used in cell phones contributing to conflict in the DRC, or will its disposal simply add more non-biodegradable poison to the planet? Is there something I can do to help people far away who are not able to meet their basic needs, whose world could well end in the near future despite the human race having the potential to stop it? Or is there somebody closer to home who I could support? Only each of us as individuals can answer these questions. But I’d like to think that this season, this Silly Season of over the top purchases and wild conspiracies about the end of the world, is far better represented by asking these questions honestly of ourselves, and then acting.

Shalom, Salaam, Peace (for those of you without a Babel Fish). Merry Christmas, and see you on the other side of the Apocalypse.

Photo: Burning rubbish tip outside Bahir Dar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Starving kids, their skeletal ribs pressing against dry brown skin, taut as a drum’s. Orange dust blows off a parched landscape in swirling ribbons while flat-topped thorn-bushes cast jagged shadows on the ground. Stands of withered maize droop. Women in technicolour batik wraps queue with emaciated infants hanging from their hips as aid workers in cargo pants disembark from white Toyota Land Cruisers and distribute food parcels. Gangster-warlords in hipster berets and Oakley shades sport AK-47s. Rape. Conflict diamonds. Sprawling slums with rusted tin sheeting. A never ending spiral of corruption, tribal infighting and resource wars.

Not so long ago, Africa’s image was more benign. Round mud-huts with thatched roofs. Tall Maasai warriors complete with assegai spears, rainbow beads about their necks and hair stained rust with ochre. Lions and zebras. The snowy heights of Mt. Kilimanjaro. White-smiled, ebony-skinned children beneath a searing tropical sun. The grassy expanse of the savannah. Dusk at the watering hole. A simpler time.

*

I love Kenya. I’ve been coming to the African continent on and off for more than ten years, and have spent a cumulative total of more than two of those years among sixteen-or-so African nations I’ve visited. But Kenya was the first, and I’ve always felt a certain closeness to the place. The East Africans in Kenya are some of the warmest, most exuberant people I’ve engaged with anywhere on earth, and the landscape is by parts gentle and rugged, but rarely dull. Nairobi is a city with an ugly facade but a vibrant heart, both a gateway and a hub.

I’m here now.

In Kenya, every man- however high or low his station- is a politician. I’m not in the cab from the airport more than ten minutes before my banter with the cab driver (“How is Nairobi at the moment?” “Nairobi is very fine!”) turns to a discussion on the merits of Mwai Kibaki’s rule and the changes that have come about since Moi’s regime was dismantled. Corruption is down. The police are more reliable- and out on the streets- and the crime rate has fallen. The economy is churning.

The biggest complaint I hear- and I hear it everywhere- is the traffic. I remember the road network in 2001. It was shoddy, potholed and governed by the maxim ‘might is right’. Vibrantly-hued minibuses with sound-systems so powerful you felt them before you heard them plowed up and down the laneways. Today the matatus are regulated, their colours bleached and replaced with a dull yellow stripe, but while the road network has been little changed, the volume of traffic has increased exponentially. Where a trip between Westlands and the city centre- three or four k’s- might once have taken fifteen or twenty minutes, it can now take over two hours in rush hour. Traffic snarls. The grid is locked. Exhaust belches, leaving the nostrils coated with grime, and drivers sit resigned, sending text messages while they wait. The new and somewhat perplexing 8-lane superhighway linking Nairobi with Thika and built by the Chinese does little to ease congestion in the city itself.

“In Kenya,” another taxi driver tells me, “They don’t like motorcycles. Everybody wants a car.”

It’s worse when it rains. I meet an old friend, C, and some of her mates outside the Java House Cafe at the Junction, a vast shopping mall that wouldn’t be out of place in a small US city. We’re joined a while later by K, who tells us he just spent forty-five minutes trying to navigate the 200 yards or so of the Ngong Road-Naivasha Road intersection to get into the place. We sit and chat. Around us is a cosmopolitan blend of Kenyans and expats- European, African and Asian. There are laptops and iPads making use of the free wifi. Groups are of varied ethnicities and backgrounds. Eclectic. Ours is no different. C, a Tanzanian, is part of the crew on a TV series in Dar-es-Salaam, and bemoans the impact that NGO-sponsored community messaging is destroying creativity in the East African film industry. K works as a political activist and campaigner, savvy and eloquent, and even in his youth expresses an awareness of the need to keep a low profile in his business; when his uncle passes by on his way to a meeting with the Prime Minister, K obligingly shakes his hand and shows the mzee due respect, but not before he’s quietly rolled his eyes at us. S, softly spoken and self-depricating, works as an administrator in the cut-flower industry- one of Kenya’s biggest. B, a white American who grew up out here, is back from the States for a few months and trying to get her small-aircraft pilot’s license.

My cab is forty-five minutes late as the rain pours down and the potholes fill. On the way back to the hotel, the driver echoes what I’ve heard before about domestic politics. He’s optimistic about Kibaki’s impact- nobody has a good thing to say about Moi, who pillaged the country and left a legacy of rampant crime and corruption- but there’s concern for the upcoming election season. The new County political system that’s recently been put in place was envisaged to try and avoid a repeat of the 2008 election upheaval that saw more than 2,000 people killed in community violence, but my driver says there’s still growing tension. He tells me he’s looking for a time when politics in Kenya is based on issues, not just ethnicity, and recounts candidly the time he and his daughter- then eight- had watched a Luo neighbour run down by a Kikuyu mob and beheaded. His daughter still goes to counselling. Still, he tells me after a pause, he is optimistic. The economy is strong, and there is good reason to hope. Like many Kenyans he expresses a belief in hard work. His family live in Thika, and he only sees them on the weekends, while during the week he drives his cab in Nairobi. When he dropped me off he still had the rest of the night to work.

*

The drive to the office takes us through Dagoretti Corner. The road is brimming with activity. Shacks house workshops producing wares that mound up at the side of the road like a Wal-Mart turned inside-out. Wrought-iron bedframes, mahogany furniture, tall slender statues of grassland animals, and pottery emblazoned with raucous colours. The avenue bustles. In the rain, umbrellas unfurl everywhere like a host of eager mushrooms. Out in an open field, there are always kids playing football, whatever time of day we pass.

Our office is well-lit and open-plan, far more pleasant a working environment than my home-base in Australia. There’s a staff of hundreds, and most are dressed far better than I. I only see one other white face my entire stay, but I feel at home. I talk operations, I talk finance, I talk strategy. My main counterpart here, M, is passionate about the concept of innovation.

“How do we innovate?” he asks me. “What are cutting edge ideas we can present to donors?”

At short notice I’m ushered into a meeting to present to a group who are working on a major submission. There’s a mix of our staff and some national government representatives. I’m only briefed on the composition as I’m being led to the room, and I’m quietly horrified. Ad hoc presentations to a couple of staff on operational issues is one thing, but suddenly I’m being asked to brief this team on how to write a cutting-edge design, on a sector I’ve never worked on, to a donor I don’t generally engage with. Somehow, there’s an unspoken assumption that as the token westerner in the building, I have pearls of wisdom to impart.

I don’t buy this, and I suspect they don’t either, but it’s something deeply engrained in the post-colonial mindset.

I fumble my way through a project tree analysis and state, in as many ways as I can, that the real experts in the room are the people I’m talking to. They listen politely. A young Kenyan on the far side of the room gently critiques my approach, and a few minutes later presents a wonderfully elegant alternative as part of his own presentation to the group.

Tonee Ndungu is slender and well spoken, with a rich intonation and vocabulary that would put most Australians of our generation to shame. He opens his talk with a TED presentation on changing educational paradigms, pausing it periodically to emphasise points before launching into the meat of his pitch. A born innovator and salesmen, he has us transfixed for the half hour he’s before us. His slideshow is textbook, infographical and trim, but it’s his ideas that have us locked on, and he’s caged them in such a simple yet comprehensive framework that it’s clear the level of thought and research that have gone into it.

Girl children are missing out on education, he says, but we assume that therefore we have to work harder to get them into schools. It’s a flawed assumption. Why not bring the schools to them?

He argues for the digitization of Kenya’s library of school textbooks, which can then be loaded onto cheap (<$100) solar-powered tablet computers, with access to books, chapters or pages paid for by the hour or day. His vision is to see these tablets (market models already exist) in the hands of every Kenyan schoolchild, right out to the furthest villages. The model is more profitable for the textbook companies (cutting out printing costs), cheaper for families (who can rent access to school material as and when needed), and most important of all, increases education penetration, allowing children (particularly girls) to access material when it’s convenient for them, not just in a school classroom.

The model is incredibly attractive, and not only that but has clearly been thought through to offer a win to all the stakeholders invovled- something that leaves many innovations falling flat when it’s not done. Whether or not it’s flawed- and I’m sure there are challenges in the mix, as there are with any idea- is in many ways irrelevant. I’m blown away by Tonee himself, and what he represents: a generation of out-of-the-box entrepreneurs, lateral- and critical- thinkers who are driving innovation in the Kenyan marketplace. Tonee’s presentation is as slick, confident and inspiring as any I’ve seen, anywhere.

*

We head out to the field. I watch the sun rise as we leave Nairobi, casting hordes of workers in dusty silhouette as they walk into town. Skeletal towers rise above the roadside waiting for giant billboards to be affixed. Traffic grinds, clogged by heavy trucks that power commerce and industry alike but make commuting miserable. I watch the sun turn mist silver behind strands of silhouetted acacia trees. We see giraffes and zebras off to the side of the road.

An hour out of town, M points to a vast fenced-off expanse to the right. It’s a new planned city, he explains. He and T, our driver, refer to it as Africa’s Silicon Valley. It’ll be a new development to help ease the pressure on Nairobi and provide an expansion for the growth that’s currently taking place. On the one hand it’s a shame to think of the waving grasses of the savannah being bulldozed into tech workshops and new housing. But this is the future, and as long as it’s regulated, nurtured, encouraged, there’s a lot of good that can be drawn from it.

After midday we’re halfway through the field visits. We’ve stopped at a school to visit some water installations. We’re forty-five minutes down a dirt track, somewhere not far off Tsavo National Park. The school is a collection of single-storey concrete blocks with holes for windows and kids in haggard uniforms. None the less I can get a cell-phone signal, and because in Australia it’s 7.30pm and therefore Magic’s bedtime back home, I call to say goodnight, while the kids eye me suspiciously as they eat their lunch.

The cell phone revolution in Africa is well attested to, but it’s none the less dramatic to see the change in such a short period of time. When I came in 2001, cell phones were just being introduced and were still limited in coverage and uptake. I can remember sitting at an internet cafe in Nairobi for 45 minutes to get a single HTML email to load on the web. This week I downloaded 8GB of an Anime series over my hotels’ free wifi network, and had I wanted to, could have checked my email in that school’s courtyard.

I chat with T and M in the car on the way back to Nairobi. The late afternoon light is full of drama, silver shafts cutting down past restless clouds and painting the landscape in mottled greens. M is voicing an interest in deploying to our emergency response in West Africa, and I learn he’s trying to pick up French. T, behind the wheel, periodically drops in phrases in French, and occasionally, Spanish. Both men are in their early thirties, and both go to night school after work, chasing more degrees. Their linguistic endeavours, while entertaining, don’t surprise me. Almost everyone in Kenya speak at least two languages- Kiswahili, and their tribal language. Those who have had a few years’ schooling will add English to that, and it’s not unusual to find those who speak one or two tribal languages other than their own, especially if they have worked multiple places in Kenya, and among those who’ve studied abroad, one, two or more colonial languages.

Kind of puts those of us in the UK, Australia and the US to shame, doesn’t it?

*

Compared to the overhauled Westgate Shopping Centre, the Sarit Centre’s now looking quite dowdy, with its bare concrete floors and dim lighting, and here the changes are subtle, but still evident. Flatscreen TVs now replace static billboards to advertise in shop windows. Outside the entrance to the Uchumi supermarket, the stall where you used to have to check your bags to ensure nobody was shoplifting has now disappeared. In its place is a Sony store selling top-end home electronics. A large billboard below the ceiling advertises Samsung’s latest foam washing machine, “Made for Africa”. Evidence of the power of this market is everywhere to be seen.

On Monday an explosion hits downtown Nairobi. A small shopping mall filled with stalls blows up. Local TV shows a small building emitting black smoke between glass-fronted high-rise towers. 35 people are injured, many of them seriously burned, and while initial reports blamed an electrical fault, the FBI are now investigating whether or not it was a low-yield fertilizer bomb. For the rest of the afternoon, Twitter is abuzz with local tweeps sharing their stories, punting their theories, and circulating links and photos about the #MoiAvenueBlast. One commentator wrily notes that a large crowd had immediately gathered at the scene of the explosion- highly inadvisable- and everybody had their cell phones out, recording the aftermath.

*

This isn’t Africa. It’s Kenya. It’s not even Kenya- just little snippets of Kenya, as seen by one white guy travelling through for a few weeks. I don’t want to be patronizing. I have no desire to set up a new stereotype. No desire to imply, either, that everything in Kenya is rosy, or high tech, or successful. Far from it. Poverty is deep here. The slums in Nairobi are some of the direst in the world. Last year’s food emergency in the north was devastating, and has been replaced this year by patchy rains that have helped out some communities and flooded others, while skipping out others entirely so that they continue to spiral into crisis. Grenade and IED attacks happen in various parts of the country on a weekly basis. While I enjoy meals with friends in cool stone manses in Karen, lush and green, I am painfully aware that I am exposed to the very privileged of this nation.

I’m not trying to give you a new stereotype. But I am trying to break down the old ones, add a little depth and complexity, another angle.

I’m not naive. Our perception of any place we’ve never seen is only ever going to be an amalgamation of the things we’ve read and heard. Our memory of a place we’ve been to will be a simplification of the sum of those memories, ordered subconciously into some image or recollection we can make sense of. Stereotypes and simplifications are simply the inevitable outworking of that process, and to some extent this is unavoidable in any perception we hold of a place, person or event.

But if our instinctive perception of a place is informed by what we’re shown of that place, then our perception of Africa will certainly be dominated by those narratives given us by mainstream media- of drought, fragility, violence and poverty. Or perhaps of wild animals and the natural beauty of the continent. Either one is a drastic and lazy oversimplification, and does no credit at all to the rich heritage of this vast and diverse place.

I hope this little piece offers a little more depth to the stereotype, a little colour to the narrative. It is partial, incomplete. It is just one tiny corner of this continent called Africa. But I hope it gives a little window to the fact that here in Nairobi, life goes on. Just like it does where you live.

Note: All photos my own. Photos 1 & 4- Niger. Photos 2 & 3- Kenya.

Note 2: You can find out more on Tonee Ndungu and his Kytabu project here, or follow him at @ToneeNdungu.

Portraiture is something I’ve increasingly aspired to as a photographer. I love a good landscape- in fact, my landscape shots are often what people seem to enjoy in my shots. Portraiture is a different skill-set though. While light changes over a landscape in such a way that you may only have a few minutes to get the shot you want, the challenge of portraiture is even greater- you may have just fractions of a second to capture the image that you have in your mind’s eye. On top of that, a really good portrait often communicates far more power and emotion to the viewer than any landscape; it’s the human element that makes it special.

The basic rules all apply, of course. You want to think about composition (the rule of thirds is a pretty reliable starting point), colour (one of the joys of travel photography are the different colour palettes you can find in both the natural and urban environments) and lighting (shooting in the tropics presents visceral challenges with regards to fierce overhead lighting, washed-out skies and high-contrast backdrops, but dust and moisture can enrich late afternoon sunlight to make it magical).

I’m sharing some specific pointers I’d like to suggest for taking a decent travel photograph. They’re not exhaustive, nor are they unique to travel portraiture, but I reckon if you can nail these, you’re well on your way to capturing the sort of image you’ll want to bring home and share with friends and family when your adventures come to a temporary halt. (I’ll leave it to you guys to decide whether these shots fit the title or not…)

Note: All these photos were taken on a 3-day field visit in rural Niger in September this year.

1. Create a Connection

This is true with any portrait. I find the most powerful portraits are those where the subject is looking straight down the camera lens. It can feel (as a viewer) as though the person is looking straight out of the photograph at you. To achieve this, you generally need some sort of relationship with the person whose picture you’re taking. It might only be a momentary one- a glance in the street- or you may have asked the person to pose for you.

In travel photography you’re often communicating across language barriers, but respect is universal, so always put it into action. Just pulling out a camera and shooting willy-nilly is a sure way to upset people. I rarely take a photo where I haven’t signalled my camera (usually pointed upwards) and waited for an inviting smile or nod, or made eye-contact with the person and waited for them to acknowledge me in some way. If I sense hesitation or hostility, I smile and move on.  Even asking in a foreign language, people usually get the idea of what you’re wanting and can communicate a reply.

While in photojournalism there’s a power and pathos that comes with shots of human suffering or deep emotion, I find the photos that people go back to tend to be ones where the subject is joyful. People are naturally drawn to beauty. With that in mind, have fun. Laugh with the person you’re shooting, give them a big smile, turn it into a game. That won’t work in all cultures: for many, having a photo taken is a serious business and they want to look their formal best. Kids, on the other hand, usually love it, and in many African countries they’re overjoyed when someone points a lens at them.

Earlier I’d asked this girl if I could take her picture, to which she’d agreed, and I got a really sweet little shot of her smiling shyly while clinging to the trunk of a tree. A few minutes later she came back to me with a cheeky smirk asking me if I’d take another photo, and when I raised my camera she giggled. I speak no Hausa and she spoke no French, but as you can see, the communication worked just fine.

2. Consider your Background

When you’re taking a portrait, the person is your main point of focus, but they exist in a context. In fact this is the major difference between travel (and candid) portraiture versus studio portraiture. With the latter, you control the background ahead of time. With the former, you need to manage it on the fly- itself a challenge that can be both satisfying and heart-breaking.

Background can become a part of your visual narrative, or it can distract from it, so think about the effect you want. Environmental portraits frame people in a shot with items that contribute to telling that person’s story. A merchant in a fruit stall, for example, may be best photographed standing with all her colourful pineapples sharply in focus. For this you probably want to use a wider-angle lens (not too wide, as wide angles distort images and can stretch facial features unnaturally) and a reasonably small aperture (f/8 and higher, light-depending). Again, the joy of travel portraiture is that backgrounds are often exotic and full of interest.

On the other hand, a child on a busy street may get lost in the clutter if you don’t defocus your background. Use a mid-range telephoto lens and open the aperture wide to get a really shallow depth of field, which naturally throws the background out of focus. Just make sure your point of focus is spot-on, or you may end up with a fuzzy subject too.

If the background is unremarkable you probably want to use this technique too.  In the photo at the top of this page, the background was burning white sand- totally uninteresting and threatening to wash out the photo- so blurring it into white made the most sense.  This has advantages (declutter and an element of the abstract) but also disadvantages (the photo is placeless and has no context).

In this first photo, I chose to use a really shallow depth of field as the background was fairly dull, and I wanted the farmer to stand out. Using a small f-stop number (f/1.8) also means that the part of the shot that is in focus is REALLY sharp. The blurred green trees give just enough information to let you know you’re in the countryside, but don’t pull the eye away from the man’s wrinkled face.

In this next shot, the girl is standing against the wall, so both she and the wall are in focus. The wall is painted with a map of Africa. Although the girl herself doesn’t stand out quite so much from the background, the colours and textures are pleasing to the eye, and the map itself tells a story and gives the girl a context which (in my opinion) adds something unique to the photograph that might have been lost had she been against an empty or blurred background.

In this third shot, the boy is in focus while everything forward of and beyond him starts to blur out. There’s just enough detail, however, to give him a context- the cows, the harness and the water containers, as well as the rural backdrop. Because he alone is in focus he still holds the viewer’s eye, but there are other elements in the image that contribute to telling the viewer something about who he is and what he does.  Note: You could argue that this photo would have benefitted from a broader depth-of-field (something around f/4) to keep the cows sharp but still blur the background, and I’d accept that criticism, although I also like how isolated the boy is from everything around him; you can see just how precise the depth is by looking at how much of the yoke, front-to-back, is actually in focus before it blurs out.

3. Be Ready for the Right Moment

Facial expressions are fleeting, as are connections. If you’re in a place where you think you might see something interesting, have your camera out and switched on, with the right lens fitted, the correct mode selected, and your eyes scanning. You might be looking for a gesture, an emotion, or a fleeting glimpse of eye-contact. People may be moving. Think about your shutter-speed- will you be able to freeze motion given the light available to you? And think too about point number one and the importance of communication and respect; even in a crowded place, have you made eye-contact with the people you’re wanting to photograph, or made sure they’re comfortable with the camera? Stand-off lenses are all very well, but as a photographer you need to be asking yourself these ethical questions.

In both of these photos, these kids made eye-contact with me for just a few seconds where they were caught in a crowd of others. The children there had been watching me for some while and I’d been looking back at them and smiling, and noting those that smiled back at me and at the camera. I already had the aperture opened up so that when my opportunity came I knew I’d be able to isolate whichever children gave me a moment to photograph, and these two did.

4. Go for the Eyes

If there’s a cardinal rule in portrait photography, it’s this one. Eyes are all about moment and connection. They communicate emotion to the viewer, and a simple glance of a couple of degrees off-lens can make the difference between a missed opportunity and a wow moment. This is particularly true of close-ups.

For eyes, think about placement; rule of thirds is usually the way forwards here, so try and get one eye onto that sweet-spot at the intersection of the thirds-lines. An eye-line straight down the barrel is usually what I go for, and almost all of the portraits I’ve loved have involved that sort of eye contact. If using shallow depth of field, ensure that the eye itself is the point of focus. It’s all too easy to accidentally focus on the forehead or the tip of the nose, and even with a really strong facial expression, you’ll lose some of the punch of the image.

These two shots were both taken at a school in Niger (one inside the classroom and one outside), and they are both among some of my favourite portraits of all time.

5. Tell a Story

This is optional, but the difference between a techncially good photo, and a photo which makes people sit up and take notice, is that with the latter, they’re experiencing something new. The beauty of travel photography is that there’s always a story to be told, something new to see, something that’s exotic to the viewer back home, so try and think of what that story might be. A facet of daily life, a curious setting, some exotic produce, or just an unusual face that communicates a sense of place or time- it can be any number of things. Put this together with capturing the right moment and working on your background, and you’ll have a photograph that will really help you remember a place.

In this photo, I managed to combine moment, background, eye-contact and connection, and the setting was such that I’ve been able to capture a little slice of existence in this rural African village. Girls in Niger, as in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, are the ones mostly tasked with collecting water- even quite young girls like this one. Here, I love the colour, the bright light, her expression, and the pouring of the water all framed crisply against a blurred backdrop of other women and girls waiting at the well behind her (and again, contrast this with the image at the top of the page which has no background).

Travel photography- and portraiture- is a personal thing, and it’s up to you as the photographer to decide what you want to remember, and how. Really, if you take a photo, and it reminds you of something special, and you’re proud of it, that’s all that matters. I wish you all the best of luck out there, and most of all, I encourage you to have fun. If you’re not enjoying yourself with you camera, seriously, what’s the point?

It’s day three in the field.  For the last two days, we’ve been spending most of our time looking at the nutrition program.  It’s been a mixed mission.  On the one hand, we’ve still got Mike and Cam, the journalist and cameraman, with us doing their story on the Niger nutrition crisis- and me (oddly enough).  On the other hand, I’ve been using this opportunity to spend time with the field teams, check up on the work we’re doing, and orient myself well for the next three weeks of work here in-country.

Today, though, we’re all about the media stories.  It’s been an interesting experience for me, watching how the news is made.  Mike and Cam are both at the top of their respective fields and they’ve been a pleasure to work with- even if there are moments when I cringe at the thought of what the villagers who watch our antics must be thinking.

We going a little more into the background of Niger- and my background as well.  It’s a nice angle for the story- an aid worker who was here in 2005 during the last crisis, returns in 2010 and comments on his journey, and what he’s seeing.  So I’m doing a few pieces to camera, usually interviewed by Mike, either beside me, or perched to one side of the camera.  When I’m not on camera, and because most of the things we’re seeing today are not part of my program responsibility, I’m a little off-duty, which is nice because I’m free to take photos.  Which of course I do.

The work aid agencies like mine do is built around both long- and short-term realities, and each has to take the other into account.  For example, although my focus is on acute malnutrition and how to make sure that hundreds of children in our areas of operation don’t die between now and November, the team also has to be aware of the long-term context.  There’s issues of chronic malnutrition, health care, disease management, clean water, hygeiene practices, breastfeeding, and a host of other trends, changes within which are measured in years, yet which have a direct and tangible affect on our work.  Likewise, when our colleagues in the development wing of the organization are designing their fifteen-year program cycles, it’s essential that these programs are built around the emergency contexts that are likely to arise during that time (such as acute malnutrition) so that the root causes of these emergencies can be tackled over the long term.

So the first place we stop is outside a small village on the horrendous road to Dakoro.  I say horrendous, because the Senegalese are funding a road project to pave it all the way up.  I remember this road from my time here.  It was laterite- a bright red dusty unsealed track running due north for several hours.  It was one of the more uncomfortable journeys to make, as the road was marred by rock-solid washboard, and you spent the journey trying not to let your teeth grind down with the jarring.

Ah the good old days.

Today, the road is under construction.  The first few miles are now metalled, and the rest is undrivable.  In fact, we spend most of the journey not on the road, but on a set of sandy tracks which drivers have been forced to forge off to one side of the road because it’s gotten so bad.

It’s a relief to branch off straight into the bush when we do.  We’re accompanying a wizened farmer who’s one of the more entrepreneurial types.  Instead of just growing millet, he’s planted acacia trees to stop soil erosion, as well as cassava (an edible root crop), melons, hibiscus, sorghum, and a bunch of other things too.  We walk around his plot and he shows us what he’s doing.  This is all good for the long-term growth of the rural areas, and the health of communities, if what he’s doing can be replicated to others.

I take a portrait of him which I love.  He’s wearing a red-and-white chequered headscarf in the bright overhead sun, and his face is full of lines, evidence of a life lived hard.  He’s looking at the camera, and I’ve stopped the 85mm lens down to f/1.8 so that the background is thrown out of focus and the details on his face are extra sharp.  It’s one of my favourite types of portraiture, and one of the most satisfying when it works.

Our next stop- and photographically my favourite- is further north at a village with a second-chance school.  In Niger, many villages don’t have schools, and those that do are often understaffed.  Children who don’t enroll into primary school at the correct age are not allowed to enroll at a later age, and therefore if they miss registration one year (or in some cases, if they have no birth certificate) they miss out on being able to gain a formal education altogether.

These schools have been set up as a safety net for kids who’ve missed out through the normal channels.  They teach the national curriculum, but teach it over four years instead of six, so that the kids can catch up sufficiently to be able to attend college (secondary school) when they graduate.  The children themselves understand the importance of education (I always enjoy visiting schools in rural communities, because the kids understand what a privilege it is to be at one, unlike so many classrooms in Europe, the Americas or Australasia).

The children in Niger are beautiful.  They’re graceful and have elegant features, and are a joy to shoot.  I mean, kids are great most places, but I’ve always found the Nigerien children particularly endearing.  These ones are no exception.

Mike and Cam set up some interviews with some of the children, and again I’m free to do some shooting.  Which I do.  Some more from this shoot (and some of my favourites from this trip- and for a long time) will show up on a later post.

From here, we visit a cereal bank.  I was involved in setting up our cereal bank program back in 2005 (when I knew very little about them; the advice was coming from our local staff who had worked with them before).  The principle is, you provide some sacks of food to a village committee when food is at its cheapest (right after harvest).  The committee then keeps this food in a central location.  If people in the village need food, they can buy food from the cereal bank at rates cheaper than the market rate- a benefit to the community- but still more expensive than the food was purchased for at the start of the year.  If the bank is managed properly, the committee should have enough money to replenish the store when the next harvest hits the markets and grain prices are surpressed again.  If they’ve done a good job and market prices have worked in their favour, they may even gain some profit which they can then invest in their own community development.

The cereal banks have come under fire at different times.  When they’re not managed well, communities expect NGOs to top them up for them, so it can become a hand-out project if not carefully supervised.  They’re vulnerable to market shocks and food shortages.  However this one we visited had done well for itself.  Over the last five years, only this year had they come to us for help to restock it, and that because the food crisis was so severe.  We gave them a few extra tonnes of food- not a huge amount- and they reckon with that they’ll go back to being able to replenish their store again in the next harvest, in a few weeks’ time.  Meanwhile, over 800 families in the community benefitted in some way from the bank’s work over the last year.

It’s nice (and remarkably rare) to be able to step back into a country many years after leaving it, and to see a project that you’ve contributed to in some small way having made a difference to peoples’ lives.  I can assure you, it doesn’t happen often.

(And obviously, when the chats and the interviews are over, I head off and take a few photos of cute kids. :) )

On the drive back to Maradi, Mike and Cam want to recreate some background shots from the Dafur incident.  Part of their piece on me will involve a brief re-telling of the ambush.  They shoot some stylised footage of the vehicle in the bush, of us taking cover behind the dashboard, and of Idi, our driver, wearing my turban and menacing the vehicle.  It’s all rather hilarious in its own way, four guys with expensive gear playing Cowboys and Indians making light of a very serious situation.  But as we watch the sun start to kiss the tops of the millet stalks, we settle back into the bumpy ride and muse on yet another good day in the field.  We’ve been lucky with the times we’ve had, and we all know it.

Tomorrow we drive back to Niamey.  Ten hours.  It’s going to be fun.

(or How New Media can Value-Add to the Aid Industry)

I Tweet.

It feels a bit like a dirty confession. “Hi, my name’s @morealtitude, and I have a Twitter problem”.

It took me a while. I’ve had a Twitter account for a few years, but it wasn’t until the Haiti earthquake when I started connecting with other aid-worker types that I started to see the value of being connected to other dynamic thinkers who have things to say on how aid should best be used to support people in difficult circumstances. And there are some great people out there who are far more concise and articulate than I am about themes central to delivering life-saving and live-changing assistance internationally. You can find their blogs on the right-hand column of mine, and I whole-heartedly recommend them.

I logged on yesterday (Wednesday) morning to see a conversation underway about a campaign called #1millionshirts. The comes from a dynamic pair of entrepreneurs called Jason and Evan, who have decided, after talking with a couple of charities, that it would be a good idea to collect a million second-hand t-shirts and a million dollars, and send them to Africa where, according to the 1 Million Shirts website, there are people who “have nothing to wear”.

To give the response that followed a context, it came on the back of a campaign that took hold in the United States called “50,000 Shoes” and which held the lofty ideal of sending reams of 2nd-hand shoes to earthquake survivors in Port-au-Prince, who had evidently had all their shoes flattened and needed them replaced more urgently than they needed, say, medical care, or clean drinking water. There were a whole load of similar shoe-oriented drives like “Soles4Souls” which basically did the same thing.

“50,000 Shoes” and its derivatives were horrible, horrible ideas. And they got roundly slammed. A lot.

I don’t really want to go into the ins and outs of the 1 Million T-Shirts debate. In brief, there are all sorts of places on the African continent with various and diverse needs and capacities, and providing free t-shirts is unlikely to have a particularly beneficial impact on either. Not to mention the fact that in the name of human dignity, it’s a generally accepted standard that NGOs do not send 2nd-hand clothes overseas. Our beneficiaries and their pride are worth more than that. The debate has been by parts entertaining, interesting and thought-provoking. However there have been more than a dozen blog posts on the topic over the last twenty-four hours or so, and they capture the issues far more eloquently and fairly than I probably would (and admittedly, occasionally, more snarkily).

For those who want to get the gist of what’s been happening up till now, the usual suspects have been commentating articulately, and Saundra has provided an awesome overview here . I particularly recommend Siena’s post here which is moderate, thoughtful and extremely on-the-money. You can also see Jason’s responses here and here , and have a giggle at some of the more snarky ‘hatorade’ here, here and here (imho, humour is a great tool for critique).

To be fair to Jason, he’s definitely copped it a bit. The idea of sending a million second-hand t-shirts to Africa may be well intentioned, but it’s certainly not well informed, and if this inspiration really is the brainchild of the two NGOs he lists on the website, they’ve done him a disservice. It’s worth noting, however, that the tirade of criticism that the idea has generated has come from a core group of aid and development practitioners who between them probably have more than two centuries of professional aid experience. In other words, people who know what they’re talking about.

For me, the issue isn’t really about the t-shirts. Un-required and poorly-targeted aid driven by donor interests is a common paradigm. This particular idea will either happen, or it won’t happen, and it’s not up to me. In his latest video upload, Jason implies he wants to listen to what the critics have to say, and there’s a teleconference set up for tomorrow (Friday) between himself and a whole bunch of the online community to discuss some of the issues- which is a great step. The general feel from the community to date is ‘it’s great that you have vision and energy; let’s try and work that energy into a more appropriate form of intervention’.

(Admittedly this message has periodically been veiled behind a thin mask of sarcasm. Sarcasm, it’s important to understand, born of many years of seeing bad development assistance, and watching people in developing countries suffer as a consequence. Born, equally, of people making the same mistakes that have been made for decades, and for which there is ample literature covering- not least of which in some of the above-mentioned websites.)

At any rate, I’m interested to see what comes out of the discussions. Hopefully, not t-shirts.

But really it’s the social media aspect of this whole thing that has me fascinated. Take a look at this process:

1. A guy gets an idea of how to help people. He’s well networked, so he uses that social media leverage he has to raise awareness and resources.

2. Folks monitoring those networks get wind of a new proposal for development asssitance, and channel it down into their own aid-and-development networks

3. Experienced aid workers with a professional and personal interest in providing good-quality overseas assistance analyze and critique the new idea

4. The donor is provided with feedback (snarky and otherwise) on the appropriateness of the idea, including lessons learned from past ideas and responses, and practical suggestions for what could be done better next time

All within about 24 hours.

What an awesome paradigm.

There’s nothing new about mobilizing social networks for fundraising for a good cause. Back when I was at university, The Hunger Site (click to provide a grain of rice, or whatever) had already gone viral, and that was more than a decade ago. But the rest of the process, that, right there, is effectively my job description (or a chunk of it). Assess and analyse relief program ideas, and work to improve them. Only instead of one mind looking from one perspective, the 1 Million T-shirts idea had more than a dozen of them, from a dozen different perspectives and heaps and heaps of pertinent experience (not to mention some extremely eloquent and, at times, highly entertaining writers).

1 Million T-Shirts is a privileged program intervention! Talk about accountability. Talk about transparency. Imagine if every aid and development proposal was treated with this sort of intensity. How much BETTER would we be doing our jobs?

There’s a fantastic post here that discusses this potential. In it, Chris summarizes the issues neatly (how I wish I could be as succint as these guys):

“Real-time input, from “the field” has just become an actor in “aid/charity/development.” Voices from places which otherwise would never be represented spoke. People in “the place” (“Africa”) where the “aid” was going got to weigh in. Experts who had not met each other were able to share experience, synthesize and create new literature on giving, aid, and development theory.”

Getting communities and beneficiaries themselves involved in discussing the ideas- yes, even before the interventions are implemented- or even agreed to. Sound far-fetched? Not in a world where cell-phones are increasingly finding their way into the pockets of farmers and villagers across the developing world. Maybe if Jason had suggested “1 Million Cell Phones” he would have received a warmer reception: let’s get our communities plugged into the new world of instant communications so they can have a real-time voice into the way in which we run our programs.

This process requires all sorts of courage. Really, what it comes down to is a relinquishing of control. From the perspective of the ideas generator, it means letting your concept get torn to shreds in an open and visible forum of learning- and in real time. Jason’s certainly learned this the hard way- and as the slightly hurt nature of his video posts suggests, there’s usually a part of your personality caught up in the desire to help, which can take a real bruising when that desire is critiqued. But this is such an important lesson for donors to learn. It simply cannot be about what donors want. It has to be what the people on the ground actually need. Saundra’s website says it all: “Good Intentions are Not Enough“. Ever.

Which is where the challenge comes in for people like myself, sitting in an NGO. Sure, I’ve now got nearly a decade of experience in this line of work. Which sounds wierd to say, come to think of it. I’m not quite sure when all that happened. None the less, for all my training, experience and education, I’m simply not a famer in Uganda, or a day labourer in Senegal, or a carpenter in rural Pakistan, or a seamstress in Vietnam. I can make educated guesses based on what has and has not worked in the past and what other more intelligent and experienced people than I tell me. But at the end of the day, I (and my organization) need to have the courage to put our ideas to the test in a far more transparent fashion, and give the people we’re ostensibly helping the opportunity to feed into those ideas.

NGO workers will tell me that we do that already. Of course we do. We consult extensively before we design a project. We carry out lengthy sessions of participatory rural appraisal with a wide range of key stakeholders among our target communities. Door to door random samples. Differentiated for age cohorts and gender groups, taking into account the opinions of the elderly and the chronically ill. We carry out participative monitoring, install complex accountability mechanisms, and run detailed post-project evaluations to critically quantatively and qualitatively analyse the impact of our work as compared to a control group so that we can accurately measure what it was we achieved, and how we can achieve that better next time.

Sure. And Gordon Brown knows how to control his temper.

The fact is, most of the decisions that get made are based off relatively shallow field analysis and limited opportunities for direct intervention by communities into the program management cycle. The fact that my number one tool (and the number one tool of my colleagues up and down the chain) is a laptop should tell you that this is a closed, elitist process. PRA and many of these other tools for engaging communities in the development process date back to the 1970s, and are focused on largely illiterate societies. They are still potentially powerful tools when applied correctly, don’t get me wrong. But in reality, our communities are increasingly becoming functionaly literate (albeit gradually and with caveats)- and, far more pertinent to this discussion, technologically savvy and connected. The cell-phone tower and kiosk selling call-credit is now as much a part of the African rural landscape as the image of a colourfully-clad woman carrying a baby in a sling on her back.

I hope that more donors do what Jason has done- namely, push their idea out into the public forum of new media and allow real-time critique to feed back into it. I hope Jason can take that criticism with a note of grace, and be willing to change his thinking and his plans, and use that inertia and passion he has to do something that will benefit, and not harm. I hope that donors can seperate their ideas (good or otherwise) from their sense of self-worth and be willing to take a bit of flak from folks who do know what they’re talking about, accept it, and move on to better things. And I hope that NGOs can start tackling the challenge of social networking seriously, and start giving a real opportunity to a broader range of stakeholders to provide real-time critical feedback on their decision-making processes and interventions in the name of greater transparency, flexibility, accountability and quality.

What it simmers down to is working as best we can to improve the lives of people who don’t have the freedoms we do. We need to take ourselves out of the equation and lay it all down to this end. If that means taking risks with our ideas, and, dare I say it, our sacred cows, so be it.

BINGOs, I hope you’re listening to me.

I’ve always been a bit of an environmentalist. From a very early age I’ve had a thing for the rain-forests, and later, a desire to be environmentally concious and relevant. I guess going through grade school in the 1980s meant that I imprinted a whole lot of those social awareness messages- especially growing up in Geneva and surrounded by the UN and other international organizations. At university I studied environmental issues in depth at both undergraduate and postgraduate degree levels- right down to examining journal articles analysing ice-core samples, pollen records and isotopes found in the shells of prehistoric crustaceans. So when ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ was released to much global chatter ten years later, I didn’t learn anything I hadn’t already concluded from the research I’d dissected years earlier.

That said, being convinced of the need for humans to be environmentally courteous, it’s still a challenge to know how to do this. Trade-offs abound. Hidden costs are everywhere. I recycle. In the past I have tried to exist without much use of a car (though living in the sprawling suburbs of a city with a rotten public transportation network- Melbourne- this has proved extremely impractical now). But I’m also aware that for my job I travel vast distances by airplane, and this probably puts me into the more pollutant-contributing members of our species- a fact I try to justify through what I do, but the fact remains.

Water is a huge issue. It ranks as the second most essential ingredient for human life to continue, after oxygen. It is an extremely limited commodity which is being depleted globally, and the worldwide distribution of which is being negatively impacted by changing climate patterns. It has long been predicted that future conflicts will be driven by the struggle for control over clean water resources.

The state of Victoria, where I live, has been struggling with drought for over a decade now. In this interactive graph provided by Melbourne Water, you can see how water levels in dams and catchments have fallen from the period 1997-99 (top 3 lines) to the period since 2007 (bottom 3 lines). We are in city-wide water restrictions at Stage 3, which restrict activities such as watering gardens, using hosepipes, washing cars and filling pools (watering gardens, for example, can only be done twice a week on designated days, using a watering can; cars cannot be washed, except for spot-washing of windows and mirrors where visibility is being affected, using a bucket and sponge).

I have always tried to do my bit. Campaigns call for 4-minute showers, and as a guy I don’t find this hard to comply with. I find I can’t take a shower now- anywhere- without mentally keeping a check on how long the water is running for. I see the value in water and I do want to conserve it.

My struggle has been wondering how much difference this sort of choice makes. I have always been sceptical. For example, it’s all very well if I restrict my water usage, or even if all households in Melbourne restrict their usage and cut back, but what sort of a difference do we make when there’s no evident transparency around the amount of water going into, say, agricultural irrigation schemes, or industrial production. In my mind, it was quite possible that 80% of the available water was going into these other things, so unless work was being done to curb water use in other economic activities (which, of course, I could see as being highly unlikely politically due to desires to maintain economic throughflow) then my efforts might very well be the proverbial drop in a bucket.

I did see a statistic at one point that suggested that household water usage accounted for about 50% of state-wide water consumption, against agricultural and industrial production. This made me feel a little better. I could see the value then in making some personal sacrifices. After all, every litre saved is a litre in itself and has value. Having lived and travelled extensively in the third world, having watched people queue for eight hours to fill up their buckets, or women and girls spend hours each day gathering water to survive, I understand how precious each of those litres are. Heck, I’ve done my time washing out of buckets on a couple of litres a day. I get it.

But at the back of my mind has always been the hidden environmental costs that go into every facet of daily life. It crops up in a variety of ways. For example, when you buy a product that’s come from overseas, it’s been transported at an environmental cost. Has it come by plane? By sea? What about the various components that went into it- did they also travel to a point of manufacture? And the packaging? Without a detailed environmental audit of every product (someday I hope to see this on packaging much like we take nutritional information for granted today), it’s impossible to tell.

Good examples of this are organic foods. Touted as better for the planet, in fact this isn’t strictly true. Yes, they reduce the amounts of chemicals we’re pumping back into the soil. But in fact, the earth doesn’t have enough fertile land area to be able to produce enough food using strictly organic techniques to be able to feed our burgeoning population. If we converted all available land to grow organic foods and stopped polluting with chemical fertilizers, pesticides and other agents, tens of millions of people (and more) would rapidly starve to death- because in fact those pesky chemical fertilizers do vastly increase the yield of food per hectare that we can produce.  Trade-offs.

Another example is ethanol fuel. It’s plugged as an environmentally friendly alternative to gasoline, and is mixed in with regular gas as the ‘green’ option on the forecourts. However the processes behind ethanol production involve vast amounts of land area converted to sugar-cane. Demand for ethanol is accelerating the destruction (by fire) of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil and the commercial exploitation of the residual infertile land for sugar-cane farming is devastating the soil quality, resulting ultimately in unsustainable practices, poverty traps for small farmers, and desertification. It is, in the long term, horrible for the environment, and I’ve stopped putting ethanol into my tank as a result (although the whole thing is a trade-off; which environmental cost is higher per litre of fuel- burning down rainforest and desertification, or pumping out higher levels of carbon fumes from my exhaust? It’s not easy to find out).

I was both fascinated and chilled to read a story last week on the BBC website about water use in Britain and how water use in developed countries was creating shortages in the developing world (not the story itself; that’s old news. But the details within it). They had taken just one resource- water- and applied exactly the above thinking to it: What is the hidden cost behind the products we take for granted? They call it “embedded” water usage- namely, how much water goes into producing said item- watering the crops that are the raw material, washing goods ready for commercial availability, involved in chemical processes, etc. There is an awesome interactive graph (yes, I like these things), and it displays per unit, and per kilo of product.

An example. A single sheet of paper takes 10 litres of water resources to produce, while a kilo of paper, around 2,000 litres (think about that the next time you by a ream of paper for your printer at home). For reference a bathtub takes on average 150 litres to completely fill. Melbourne’s household water target per person per day is 155 litres (and water statements here now come with little graphs showing how close your household water usage has been over the past quarter to that target).

Another example. A loaf of bread takes about 440 litres. Per kilo, bread requires about 1,000 litres.

Or take a cup of coffee. To make a single cup of coffee, 140 litres is required. Think about how little actual coffee goes into a mug- just a few dark grains at the bottom of the cup (or jammed into the espresso machine). To make a kilogram of coffee- get this- the report says it takes 21,000 litres. 21,000!!! When you see those lovely-looking 10kg hessian sacks of smooth polished coffee beans sitting by the counter at your local Java-juice dispenser to add a little ambience and authenticity, consider the fact that it took 210,000 litres of precious water just to produce that one sack. In perspective, that’s about what a thoughtful household in a western country might use in a year. It’s also the volume of a moderate sized swimming pool. 10kgs. It’s crazy.

Here’s one more. Jeans. This one freaked me out. To make a single pair of jeans- get this- it takes 10,500 litres. For one pair! This kills me! I never want to buy a pair of jeans ever again! And I like jeans! I have a good buddy who works for Levi’s here in Australia! But I can’t get over this number. It’s mind-blowing stuff.

Society is seriously screwed.

Anyways, that’s my rant for the day. Hopefully not too much doom-and-gloom in there. But at the same time, hopefully something to think about the next time you buy something.

And in all seriousness, I can’t wait for the day that all our commercial products have environmental information printed on them, just like today we can read the nutritional information. If we want to keep not just our bodies but our society and our world healthy, I think this is absolutely critical.

Shalom, Salaam, Peace.

Photos:

1. Fill: A Haitian man fills a water container from an NGO-installed water-point on the island of Gonave, off the coast of Port-au-Prince.

2. Industry: Steam billows from an industrial smokestack in western Melbourne.

3. Stain: Saline water stained brown flows out into the sea in northern New Zealand.

4. Outback: Australia’s outback landscapes support it’s moniker as “The Dry Continent”- the most arid landmass on the planet.

5. Stage III: Hosepipe bans and garden watering restrictions are hallmarks of Melbourne’s Stage III water restrictions.

6. Gathering Water: Haitian women and children gather at an NGO-installed water point to collect water.

7. Shade: A boy shelters from the burning midday sun in the Sahelian drylands of southern Niger during the 2005 famine.

8. Therapeutic Feeding Centre: An infant waits to be registered at an NGO-run therapeutic feeding centre for severely malnourished children during the 2005 famine in Niger.

9. Stream: Steam blows from industrial smokestacks, western Melbourne.

10. Pouring Water: A Nigerien girl fills clay jars of water from a deep well.  Girls and women in Sahelian Africa spend many hours of each day gathering water for their households- first hauling the heavy liquid up from wells and bores, then transfering it to pots which they then carry back to their homes one by one. 

To see more of my photography please check out my Gallery here.

We visited the tiny hamlet of Pavantslom high up in the hills behind Huehuetanango.  The road was a treacherous unsealed pathway of hairpin bends above panic-inducing drop-offs without so much as a fenceline between the wheels of the Land Cruiser and a five-hundred foot roll.  The hills themselves were dusty and badly eroded- a combination of geography and natural resource management.  It was hot.

Guatemala’s brutal civil war left the country’s soul badly tattered, and fear in many rural communities is rife.  I was told the villagers here hadn’t had a white visitor in years, and there was an element of disquiet and even distrust to begin with.  ML, my colleague, is a Honduran- both the most passionate and most competent community mobilizer I have ever met.  I have worked with her in at least six countries in Central and South America, and everywhere she goes she is able to inspire local people with her words and her attitude.  Her subject of expertise is community-based disaster management- encouraging communities to take measures to identify the risks they face, and then put into action a plan to reduce those risks.  People who have spent their lives planting maize in a radius of two miles from their birthplace stop and listen to her because she knows how to engage them, how to relate to them.  I’ve watched her do it equally in remote hillside villages and in urban slums, and her fluency in the vocabulary of poverty humbles me.

It took a little while for people to let me take photos.  During the civil war, people with cameras came to mountain villages like Pavantslom, and shortly afterwards, children would disappear.  I waited to be invited to break out my camera, and even invited people warmed to the camera to varying degrees.  By the end of the shoot, mothers were asking me to take photos of their children- but it took them a good half an hour to get around to that point.

Relating to people through the lens is always a dance, and this photoshoot was actually one of my first with a proper portrait lens.  Indeed, I still wouldn’t consider myself an experience portrait photographer today- although I have considerably more experience than I did two and a half years ago in these hills just south of the Mexican border.

I enjoy the variety and intensity of expressions that came through the lens that day.  Not always beautiful in a typical sense of the word, but certainly beautiful in the soulful sense, I think the reason I like this shoot so much is the lack of pretense.  The gazes are full of honesty, and unlike shoots you do in many other parts of the world where people are used to cameras, here there was no sense that people were putting on a display or trying to be vain.

I’m not travelling for a few months at the moment- at least, not for work- and my opportunities for doing portrait shoots such as this one are a little more limited.  I think I’m sharing this shoot as much for my own wistfulness as any other reason, but I hope you can enjoy travelling through the expressions captured here.

Buy art

In the aid worker’s lexicon of Three Letter Acronyms (TLAs) we call them CHEs- Complex Humanitarian Emergencies.  They’re what we get when we layer a natural or human-made disaster over a situation that was already pretty messed up to begin with (see, for example, Darfur, or the war in Eastern DRC, or northern Pakistan).

CHEs are typified by large-scale emergency events (usually covering a significant portion of one country, or several countries), generally involve some level of acute emergency layered over a chronically unsuccessful context (a cyclone, or food shortages, or a mass displacement of people in a war zone or an unstable region), and usually take place in a situation where the national or regional government is either unwilling or unable to solve the problem, and is therefore characterised by failure of state or governance systems.  They also usually take years, and sometimes decades, to resolve.

Basically, they’re screwed.

Interestingly, CHEs don’t necessarily make a big splash in the media.  Eastern DRC is the case-in-point of this sort of situation, but others include the Central African Republic, eastern Chad and northern Uganda, all of which spend very little time grabbing headlines but are archetypal ‘forgotten’ complex emergencies.

This week, we have a grand example of an emergency that is anything but forgotten, but certainly highly complex.  The earthquake which struck Haiti less than 72 hours ago has effectively flattened the capital, Port-au-Prince, and current estimates from the Red Cross suggest that 45-50,000 people have been killed, with tens of thousands more injured and hundreds of thousands homeless.  As much as a third of the tiny island nation’s population has been directly impacted by the disaster.

But Haiti too bears all the hallmarks of a CHE in the making.  Although on the surface it appears to be a natural disaster, like the 2003 earthquake in Bam, Iran, or the Padang earthquake in Indonesia earlier this year- both of which were relatively ‘simple’ emergencies, with functioning (if overwhelmed) state structures and relative stability- the hallmarks of Haiti’s instability are already bubbling to the surface.

What is it that makes the Haiti context so complex?

Geography- Port-au-Prince sits snug against a harbour, ringed by extremely steep hillsides.  The hillsides themselves are crammed with shanties.  When the shaking started, these shanties crumbled into the valleys, taking access roads with them.  The congestion of blocked roads and the relatively small amounts of flat land in Port-au-Prince make it difficult to move about amidst the destruction.

Poverty- Haiti was a poor country to begin with- currently ranked 149th out of 182 countries on the UNDP’s Human Development Indicator.  30% of the country had access to clean drinking water.  The country struggles to maintain enough food for the population at attainable prices.  Infrastructure is underdeveloped, trade (and therefore transportation) links are limited, building codes are often ignored and disaster preparedness measures not implemented.  With a baseline like this, there is very little resilience, or bounce, in the national coping mechanisms to manage a disaster of this magnitude.

Governance/Administration- Haiti’s government is fragile at best, suffering repeated coups and attempted coups, and currently largely propped up by the international community (backed by US political and military intervention, and 9,000 UN-mandated Brazilian peacekeepers).  Services, such as health-care, policing and emergency response were already weak.  With the earthquake, these services and structures have largely collapsed.  The government is effectively not functioning.  The scale of the devastation far outstrips the capacity of existing emergency services to respond, but even if it didn’t, because the disaster has focused on the seat of power, those very people who should be running those response services- paramedics and policemen- are themselves victims- dead, wounded, or freeing loved ones from rubble.

The UN and NGOs- While the chronic insecurity in Haiti over the years has bred a stable population of international and national aid workers, this populace was themselves not spared.  The UN has lost over 150 staff and peacekeepers, with their headquarters flattened.  As the driving force supporting government and national security services, their effective removal from the picture now leaves a huge vacuum.  NGOs themselves have also been hit, with most charities losing staff members and building facilities, hardware, and connectivity.  Staff themselves are victims, many of them still trying to locate loved ones among the rubble.  Many will not be in a position to return to their posts for some time.

Cyclone Season- From April onwards- three short months away- tropical storms and cyclones will start spawning in the Atlantic Ocean and sweeping over Hispaniola.  Every year Haiti takes at least one direct hit, and usually several, from these violent storms.  90 days (3 months) is a standard block of time during which to run the emergency phase of an operation, but it will take years (at least) to rebuild Port-au-Prince, replace basic services, repair damaged infrastructure and maintain the wellbeing of the population during this process.  Haiti’s populace are vulnerable to storms at the best of times, living as they do in ravines and on steep-sided mountains.  Without the protection of concrete buildings, the hundreds of thousands of people likely to still be in temporary accomodation such as tents or makeshift shanties will be at great risk when the next storm-season comes aroun.

Logistics- Port-au-Prince has an international airport of a moderate size- it can take commercial jets but does not have a large capacity, creating a log-jam in aircraft handling.  The road from the airport is damaged.  The seaport is also damaged and ships cannot dock.  Roads internal to Port-au-Prince are clogged with debris and temporary settlements- people refusing to return to their damaged homes (if they are still standing) for fear of aftershocks.  The international airport in Santo Domingo, in neighbouring Dominican Republic, is the alternative airport of choice, but is also strained to capacity, while roads between the two nations are not in great condition and somewhat insecure.

Security- Port-au-Prince is one of the world’s more colourful cities- by which I don’t just mean the paint on the walls, but the level of danger.  A kidnap capital, foreigners tend to remain behind barbed wires, are leery of spending much time walking around on the street, and avoid public transportation.  Criminal gangs run large portions of the slums, while drug cartels exploit the country’s fragile security services to make Haiti a base for drug-running operations.  Fragile and unpopular governance has provided Haiti with multiple and often bloody coups, rebellions and put-downs, and the capital and other urban areas are home to regular riots and violent protests.

Outmigration- With the capital city in ruins, people are streaming out into the countryside as road networks open up.  Many of them are injured or have lost everything.  While identifying and supporting hundreds of thousands of earthquake-affected citizens within the compact confines of Port-au-Prince was already a daunting prospect, trying to locate, register and assist a population that is rapidly spreading across the countryside is a staggering logistical challenge.

Over the next weeks, dozens of aid agencies, foreign governments, military forces and UN agencies will coverge on Port-au-Prince, attempt to identify the people most at need of assistance, and bring in hundreds of millions of dollars worth of supplies, materials, food and medication.  This will be accompanied by thousands of foreign nationals.  Working with national counterparts, these various organizations will attempt to distribute assistance as evenly as possible to the highest standards possible.  In order to acheive this aim, they will have to contend with the above complexities.

And that’s just for starters.

Aid is a complex business.  Aid agencies of every colour get lots wrong, good intentions or no.  There’s plenty of criticism out there about the way these agencies do business, and a lot of it is merited.  By the same token, lives will be saved and vastly improved in many cases.  Where aid doesn’t work as well as it’s supposed to, it’s worth bearing in mind a few of the complications that can make doing this job a mind-knottingly challenging prospect.

How would you resolve the Haiti earthquake dilemma…?

In 2005 I was sent to the West African nation of Niger. A country that vies for the bottom spot on the UNDP’s Human Development Indicator, it remains one of the world’s most impoverished countries. It has one of the lowest childhood survival rates in the world. Women give birth to seven or eight children, and it’s commonplace to find women who have lost two or three children to malnutrition and disease. Although official figures are hard to come by, it’s estimated tens if not hundreds of thousands of children die each year from malnutrition, disease, the lack of public health care, and poor child care practices such as nutrition and hygeine.

In 2005, a combination of crop failure due to poor rains and locusts, skyrocketing prices and predatory merchant behaviour led to a widespread food shortage across the nation. Niger is largely made up of desert and dry scrub, with a thin band of land in the south of the country which flourishes during the rainy season, and has just a single growing season. The main cereal crop, millet, is low in nutrients essential to strengthen young children. Hundreds of thousands of children were malnourished, and several million people were considered to be at risk. A large humanitarian operation was launched, ostensibly to respond to the ‘famine’ that was touted in the media, although in actual fact this was not a famine, but a nutrition crisis that targeted the very young (in fact not a single case of excess adult mortality was recorded due to food shortages during this time). Feeding centres were established and tens of thousands of food aid was transported into the country.

I was stationed in Maradi for the first few months of my deployment, a small town on the Nigerian border (note the confusable adjectives- Nigeria/Nigerian; Niger/Nigerien), working as a program officer, helping to set up and support the running of some of our relief projects. I was then moved to the capital, Niamey, and when our response manager left shortly before Christmas, I took his position.

It was a difficult time, professionally and personally, but one rich in experience. I did a fair amount of writing at the time, and I thought I would post some of my pieces here. Although they’re a little out of date, they fit the bill of travel pieces and observations on the aid world.

The first of these I’ve already posted. The next few I’ll publish over the coming weeks. I hope you enjoy reading through some of my memories.

***

February 2006

As always, living and working in Africa is a swirling series of irreconcilable dichotomies; a strange blend of privelage and want, of elation and exhaustion, of adrenaline and bitterness. I have found this before during my shorter visits, but living in one of the world’s very poorest countries, one of the most dysfunctional, frustrating, fascinating and enchanting places I have come across, I find these feelings enhanced and confused.

Click here to keep reading…